Subject: Conservation exhibits
A response to David Harvey's inquiry on conservation exhibits: This type of exhibit hosted by an institution can be a very effective tool in public relations efforts and can be implemented with success under certain conditions. These thoughts are an overview of my experience while spending six months working on-site performing a conservation treatment in the lobby at the Mammoth Hot Springs Hotel, Yellowstone National Park. Advantages include: * The enjoyment for a visitor to watch the treatment process. * The promotion of good will for the museum. * The promotion of awareness of the conservation field. * A renewed interest of visitors in supporting the museum, hopefully. * And it demonstrates the concern the institution has in caring for its collection. Disadvantages include: * Visitor's questions, visitor's sounds, and visitors occasionally crossing the barrier line can interrupt the practitioner's concentration. * Volunteer interpreters are not always available to mediate. An interpreter's presence is key to the success of the exhibit. * Scheduling conflicts with other events in the exhibit space. In summary, the advantages can out-weigh the disadvantages. If properly set up, I believe that exhibited conservation treatments can be beneficial to the public opinion without negatively impacting the treatment, institution, or conservator. It takes an inordinate ability on the part of a conservator to effectively treat an object while being "on stage" as it were, in front of the general public. Without interpreters being on hand continually during treatment this burden falls directly on the conservator, which makes his job nearly impossible. By concentrating solely on the work the visitor does not receive fair recognition. This then, undermines the public relation efforts sought by the institution. John Kjelland, conservator *** Conservation DistList Instance 11:85 Distributed: Wednesday, April 22, 1998 Message Id: cdl-11-85-007 ***Received on Tuesday, 21 April, 1998