Subject: Meeting on pollution-induced artefact deterioration
As Jean Tetrault recently mentioned (7 Jan) a meeting I am organising later in the year I thought I would send out some more details: A meeting will take place in May or June at Strathclyde University in Glasgow, Scotland, to discuss a number of issues related to the effects of indoor generated pollution. We are all well aware of the deleterious effects of 'carbonyl pollutants', such as acetic acid and formaldehyde (from wood and wood-related products), on a wide range of susceptible materials such as metals and calcareous items. At present, independent testing methods for the presence of these vapours and gases exists, and pollution sampling is becoming commonplace in many museums. However the sampling methods used vary considerably from the application of simple visual tests (for example using metal coupons and strips) to the implementation of integrated samplers which can identify and quantify specific pollutants. Understandably, different methods are used by different institutes, depending on what materials, instrumentation, money etc. is available to them. The meeting (which I hope will be the first of many) will include a number of topics for discussion : 1. the extent of damage on artefacts due to the presence of indoor pollutants such as acetic acid and formaldehyde. 2. the various sampling methods currently in use for atmospheric monitoring and materials testing. 3. whether or not standard operating procedures could have a place in the museum environment. (So that interlaboratory comparisons can be performed, i.e. the results obtained from individual testing experiments would not only be relative to the individual collection under examination, but would be comparable to results obtained by other institutes following the same standard method of analysis). 4. the possibility of introducing 'threshold' pollution levels that artefacts can sustain without significant damage (note that the term threshold is used loosely here as the no-effect level should theoretically be at zero pollutant concentration. Although, to assume that such situations exist, or could be invoked, is illusory). This first, informal meeting will involve scientists I currently collaborate with (no other selection criteria has been involved!) from the Getty Conservation Institute, the Netherlands Institute for Cultural Heritage, possibly the Canadian Conservation Institute, as well as scientists from museums and Universities in the UK. We would like to welcome any suggestions and/or topics for discussion from those concerned with the problem of indoor-generated pollution. Particularly anyone who has detected corrosion as a result of pollution attack and what, if any, sampling and mitigation strategies were implemented. Thanks in advance for your contributions, Dr. Lorraine Gibson Dept. of Pure and Applied Chemistry University of Strathclyde 295 Cathedral Street Glasgow G1 1XL +44 141 548 2073 fax +44 141 548 4212 *** Conservation DistList Instance 11:61 Distributed: Wednesday, January 14, 1998 Message Id: cdl-11-61-003 ***Received on Wednesday, 14 January, 1998