Subject: CAL budget
Dear Bert van Zelst: Thank you for your kind message to the list on the CAL budget and the answers it contained to my questions (at least in part). I can certainly understand your amazement at the evolution of my question about the possibility of CAL taking on a research initiative on microwaves in conservation transforming into a debate on the CAL budget. A simple answer to my question as to whether this would be possible or not would have sufficed. Since I knew from my lobbying for more money for conservation that the CAL budget had been increasing, I simply noted that, in the context of "isn't this great, we've had some success". Unfortunately Don seemed to take this as a criticism. I still can't understand why. Nevertheless, I does not matter to me whether the CAL "discretionary funds" (and how this money in a budget is defined varies by government and accounting procedures) amount to $800,000 (as I was told) or from 625k to 579K as Bert argues, what is important is what comes out of it. As Bert notes those of us who are U.S. citizens will be paying our taxes by April 15th and certainly the conservators in private practice may be interested in what the CAL is doing and somewhat curious by the somewhat defensive attitude that might be interpreted as coming from Don and Bert's remarks here. What might be a better response, I think, is to inform us of what the CAL is doing, and what research plans the CAL has for the next 5 years. Certainly this would help explain why the CAL could not take up a microwave study and also it would be helpful and informative to know what kind of research initiatives the CAL is willing to take on from the conservation community. We have become accustomed to the CAL being a valuable information source as a producer of basic research in conservation. Will this continue and how can we be involved? What is the conservation community's role with the CAL and how can we help lobby for more funds for CAL research, outreach, publications and training? At the San Diego AIC meeting this June I sat around with Eleanor McMillan reminiscing about the old CAL, how wonderful it was and all the great things that came out of it. I'm no critic of the Lab, but rather a great supporter. But to do that job, I and others in the conservation community need to know what is going on and how to help. So, Bert, perhaps you can profile the CAL's work in a post here and outline future projects and give us a little information on how to be boosters? Niccolo Caldararo Director and Chief Conservator Conservation Art Service *** Conservation DistList Instance 11:58 Distributed: Wednesday, January 7, 1998 Message Id: cdl-11-58-009 ***Received on Wednesday, 24 December, 1997