Subject: Crazing of acrylic sheeting
About two years ago we discovered that a group of about 20 large lithograph prints which had been framed about 3 years before exhibited a continuous, translucent, dull white appearance which we first feared was mould growth on the window mount. These prints were trap mounted with broad areas of mount board at the periphery of the prints and the white was only present in the area of the mat where it contacted the acrylic sheet. On disassembly, it became apparent there was no mould, but rather, the acrylic was minutely crazed where it came in contact with the mount board. No damage to the board or the print was or has since become apparent. We used Canson buffered board in white and ivory during this period of time . The glazing was 3 mm ultra violet absorbing clear cast acrylic which is always supplied by the same retailer. Our supplier has confirmed that her has supplied different brands at different times due to changing price and availability and we had noticed variations in the protective wrappings of the sheets from time to time. We also checked new supplies and caught a few deliveries which were not in fact u.v. absorbing which were returned. We sent samples of the crazed acrylic sheet to our supplier who in turn contacted his various suppliers and have been told its all a mystery, but that sometimes too much styrene is used in the manufacture and this can cause crazing. Since our first discovery, we have occasionally encountered additional examples on prints in various media and photographs and have simply replaced the acrylic. No damage to the mount or work of art has yet been noted. My suspicion is that there may be a reaction with long term contact of buffered board with some types of acrylic sheet. It would be considerably worse if buffered board reacted to all cast acrylic as we have mounted a huge number of works in this board. Fortunately, most are stored in Solander boxes and these mounts would only briefly be in contact with acrylic sheet when they were occasionally displayed in stock frames. Has anyone had a similar experience, has any damage to works or mounts been documented and has any explanation been demonstrated? Thomas Dixon Chief Conservator National Gallery of Victoria Fax: +61 3 92080246 *** Conservation DistList Instance 10:53 Distributed: Thursday, December 5, 1996 Message Id: cdl-10-53-006 ***Received on Thursday, 5 December, 1996