Subject: Leather dressing
Sent by Angela Thompson, National Gallery, London, on behalf on Margaret Hey who is not on the List. Wim Smit's contribution (Conservation DistList, Instance: 10:39, October 16, 1996) gives me the opportunity to round out and link together several of the experiences he reported. In early 1971 (or perhaps later 1970) Christopher Clarkson and I visited Dr. Ronald Reed (he of the book) in Leeds to discus bookbinding skins and leather dressing. He emphasized for us the great importance of water in giving flexibility to skin (a concept not so well appreciated then as it is now, some 25 years later). He explained that leather dressing served to lubricate the fibres so that they move one over another more easily and would also help to a) retain moisture within the skin structure, and b) prevent or at least slow down the penetration of pollutants from the atmosphere. However, full benefit would only be obtained if some moisture had been put back into the skin before applying any leather dressing. Ron therefore advised that books should be kept in a more humid environment before applying any dressing. I don't think this information has ever appeared in print although I have always subsequently taught it. It doesn't contradict any of the individual pieces of information supplied by Wim Smit but simply links them together while giving due credit to the originator. One other point--the disagreement over the value of leather dressing stems from the time when mixtures contained potassium lactate--a substance over which there was at one time considerable controversy. Again, Ron Reed explained that applying potassium lactate to an acid (degraded) skin would release lactic acid. Like acetic acid, lactic acid can swell collagen fibres and thereby make them more vulnerable. However, unlike acetic acid, lactic acid is not very volatile so that repeated applications of the leather dressing would lead to a build-up of lactic acid--not a good thing. *** Conservation DistList Instance 10:49 Distributed: Thursday, November 21, 1996 Message Id: cdl-10-49-001 ***Received on Wednesday, 20 November, 1996