Subject: Dust cloths
My references were to tests during the 80's. The LC and NARA info was picked up at conferences. In print there is the following: Perhaps the DistList readership would be interested: from American Archivist, v.46, #4, p. 473: Dust Cloths Tested. Michele V. Cloonan has recently been involved in the testing to two dust cloths: Chicopee's Stretch 'N Dust and Guardsman Chemicals' One-Wipe. Informal testing was begun during the cleaning of the Newberry Library's collections in 1982. Laboratory testing of these cloths, however, was not possible until Winter of 1983. These tests, carried out by Walter C. McCrone Associates, were designed to demonstrate whether or not the two dust cloths left harmful residues on leather, paper, or book cloth that would contribute to the early deterioration of library materials. Similar tests had been executed by McCrone on other cleaning products for the Library Technology Program of the American Library Association in the late 1960s. The most recent test made use of microscopic examination, phloroglucinol tests, pH determination, color change, the Elmendorf tear test, and the M.I.T. folding endurance test. The test results indicated that there was no significant difference between the samples treated with a dust cloth and those that were not treated with any cloth. Therefore, both Stretch 'N Dust and One-Wipe can be safely recommended to librarians who need to clean their collections. The Newberry Library provided the leather and paper samples, and Bill Minter the cloth Samples. A more detailed analysis of the testing will appear in an upcoming issue of "The Abbey Newsletter: Bookbinding and Conservation." Other citations: College and Research Libraries News 44:7 (July/August 1983, p. 251). CAN #15 (October 1983, p.13). *** Conservation DistList Instance 10:45 Distributed: Thursday, November 7, 1996 Message Id: cdl-10-45-006 ***Received on Monday, 4 November, 1996