Subject: Fading blueprints
Belinda Fireman <4blf1 [at] qlink__queensu__ca> writes >I have recently observed fading of an area of a blueprint. After >being kept in the dark for a few days, the colour was completely >restored. I am currently researching the history, chemistry and conservation of cyanotypes (or blueprints) on a commission from the National Museum of Photography, Film & Television, Bradford, England, with a view to publishing in 1997, through the Science Museum, London, a monograph on this topic. Regrettably, my work has not yet progressed to the stage where I can give quantitative answers to the questions recently posed by Belinda Fireman. For the present, it seems that all the evidence concerning photosensitivity is anecdotal: there is no doubt that some cyanotypes fade in the light; it is also true that this fading may reverse on dark storage, but I have never seen any study of how complete is the recovery. It is equally true that some observers report no fading at all in some cyanotypes that have received extended exposures to light. There is no inherent contradiction here: the image substance, Prussian Blue, is a complex of widely variable composition, dependent on its method of preparation. Its sensitivity to pH, moisture, light and residual impurities in the print will also vary enormously. It is well-known that Sir John Herschel invented the process; it is perhaps less well-known that he discovered at least fifteen chemically distinct ways of making images in Prussian Blue. Even his "standard" method--so widely and inaccurately re-published--has as many different recipes proposed for it as there are writers on the subject, and the recipes employed for some commercial blueprint papers were almost Byzantine in their complexity. Prussian Blue is attracting much attention in current chemical research for quite different reasons, and there is a large and growing technical literature on it (for its use as an electrochromic display device; for its ability to act as an antidote to thallium poisoning; and for its ability to absorb and safely dispose of Caesium 137 contamination resulting from the Chernobyl--and other--nuclear accidents). Conservators, too, may soon hope to benefit from our currently improving chemical understanding of this fascinating substance. For the interim, my advice would be: don't take *any* chances with precious cyanotypes. Restrict their exposure to short durations of UV-less, 50 lux tungsten illumination. The avoidance of contact with alkali is, of course, already deeply engraved in the conservation canon, but on no account should they be washed in water, either, because some forms of the Prussian Blue colloid may be readily peptized. I hope to be able to provide a quantitative commentary on these issues in a year's time. Meanwhile, I should be very happy to hear privately from anyone with an experience or interest in cyanotypes/blueprints. Mike Ware Dr. Michael J. Ware 20 Bath Road Buxton, Derbyshire, SK17 6HH, UK +44 1298 78604 *** Conservation DistList Instance 10:12 Distributed: Friday, July 19, 1996 Message Id: cdl-10-12-002 ***Received on Wednesday, 17 July, 1996