Subject: Fossils
William Lindsay's advice (in Conservation DistList Instance: 9:73) on conservation of the ammonite in limestone is good but perhaps does not go far enough. There is information available on in situ conservation, and there are available geological conservators with formal training. I am the only person in the United States with a post-graduate diploma in geological conservation, and there are several people in Canada (Gerald Fitzgerald and Robert Waller at the Canadian Museum of Nature come to mind) who are qualified as geological conservators. I recently concluded co-teaching professional short courses in preventive and advanced geological conservation. These courses will be offered again in 1997 in the US, and 2 more will be added: identification of geological materials, and conservation of geological materials in situ. These are being offered to augment the stone conservation literature (a surprising amount of which does very little to identify geological materials) and to answer the ever-demanding issues in geological site conservation. I do not have the original posting by Cor Knops, but I would urge Mr. Lindsay and others to consider the UV-degradation characteristics of any polymeric material recommended for in situ conservation. I have seen several in situ applications which were very detrimental to the specimen or site as they rapidly degraded. Sally Shelton Director, Collections Care and Conservation San Diego Natural History Museum P.O. Box 1390 San Diego, California 92112 619-232-3821 Fax: 619-232-0248 *** Conservation DistList Instance 9:79 Distributed: Tuesday, May 28, 1996 Message Id: cdl-9-79-003 ***Received on Monday, 27 May, 1996