Subject: Curatorial approval of minor conservation treatments
The curatorial and conservation personnel of the Canadian Centre for Architecture are currently attempting to establish guidelines for curatorial decision making regarding the conservation of objects in their collections. In general, the conservator and curator must jointly sign a treatment proposal before treatment begins on any object. We are wondering, however, if there is a way to sidestep the issue of curatorial permission for certain minor stabilizing treatments (eg. repair of small edge tears, reattachment of fragile or detached fragments to avoid losing them) without compromising the guidelines we have been trying so hard to set. Because our collections are almost entirely paper based we are often under great pressure before an exhibition to stabilize hundreds of works of art on paper. Many of them require only minimal treatment, and our work slows down greatly when we must wait for written permission for these minor operations. In the past we have sometimes worked with verbal approval only, but this informal arrangement has been very inconsistent. We are now looking for a way to write this sort of permission into our treatment approval guidelines. We have thought of appending a sentence such as the following to our guidelines: "Conservators are authorized to carry out minor stabilizing treatments (such as repair of small tears and attachment of fragile or detached fragments to prevent their imminent loss) without prior written permission of the custodian of the collection. Conservators will follow normal documentation procedures for such treatments." Do conservators in other institutions always need curatorial approval for ALL treatments? Are there any institutions which have different guidelines regarding curatorial approval for minor vs. major treatments? I would like to hear from anyone who has an interest in this topic. Karen Potje Head, Conservation/Preservation Canadian Centre for Architecture Montreal, Canada 514-939-7000 *** Conservation DistList Instance 9:65 Distributed: Monday, March 18, 1996 Message Id: cdl-9-65-004 ***Received on Wednesday, 13 March, 1996