Subject: Digital imaging for preservation
I am a grad student in the Geography Department at the University of Western Ontario. I am currently working on a master's thesis about applications of digital technology to the preservation of colour maps. I use the word preservation loosely, as I realize that for several very good reasons the digital format is *not* a recognized archival medium. I am, however, arguing the case that since digital technology can increase access and decrease handling of the fragile originals, it is a viable alternative to other, more traditional methods. My problem is this: most of the literature that I have found on the topics of conservation/preservation in general, and digital preservation in specific, have argued both cases quite successfully. I mean, the authors are too polite; they seem to be tippy-toeing around the issues, as if they are afraid of offending someone. I suspect, however, that feelings run a little deeper than that. I would like to get the opinions of some people who aren't worried about pleasing their publishers, as it were (being a soon-to-be first-time published author myself, I know what that feels like). P. Andrew Ray Department of Geography University of Western Ontario *** Conservation DistList Instance 9:56 Distributed: Thursday, January 25, 1996 Message Id: cdl-9-56-013 ***Received on Wednesday, 17 January, 1996