Subject: Stainless steel tacks
Laszlo Cser <laszlo [at] restorart__com> writes >In paintings conservation there several different methods for >attaching canvas to various substrates. In the case of attaching >canvas to wooden stretchers there are two standard methods: staples >(by means of manual or powered staple guns) and tacks (usually >hammered, referring to the tacks not the conservator). In the former >case monel staples are available where metal stability is a >consideration. In the latter case, there are a number of options >from blued steel, aluminum, and copper, each having there own >inherent material or application problems. >... >Does anyone know if this product exists and where? Is there any >interest in a product of this kind to pursue a production run for SS >tack hungry conservators the world over? As a painter for 20 years and conservator of 15 years, I understand the query regarding stainless steel staples. Because of my concern of light corrosion on the 100 year old tacks, I began to use copper and then abandoned them as the softness of the metal. Personally and aesthetically I do not like staples,,,but they are much faster . Because of this they reduce the time you will spend , and the bill for your client, which I also consider to be important. While I do understand a conservators concern for materials, I also have to balance this with the effectiveness of the material vs. over-polishing the apple. My experience has shown me that once a painting is valued enough to come to a conservators hands, I am assured that it will not be stored in an salt-water Oyster Shack on pilings . But if it is in such an atmosphere, even stainless steel will corrode. I have seen SS so corroded it looked like iron. SS ain't stainless folks. So, I have begun to using cheap, fast drive and effective regular staples. Chances are the painting you work on today will have a nice home and a check-up in less then 25 years. Have some faith in your clients (and museums) and save them some money. Mel A. Hardin *** Conservation DistList Instance 9:15 Distributed: Friday, August 4, 1995 Message Id: cdl-9-15-007 ***Received on Saturday, 29 July, 1995