Subject: The New Republic article on preservation
In the March 6, 1995 issue of The New Republic, on page 31, Stanley Kauffmann, TNR's columnist on "Books & The Arts," writes as follows: Belatedly I've come across a book published in 1992 on the grave subject of film preservation--*Nitrate Won't Wait* by Anthony Slide (McFarland & Co., Box 611, Jefferson, NC 28640, 240 pp., $42.50). Slide, a prolific author on a wide range of subjects, here concentrates on the history of efforts to preserve films in this country, especially those made before 1950 that are on the frighteningly impermanent nitrate stock. He details the archival work that has been done in this country and compares it with the work in some other countries. He underscores the urgency and the need for funds, but he is candid enough to say: 'The major problem facing film preservation in the 1990s is one of selectivity.' It's easy, relatively, to find money for the preservation of outstanding films, but what about all the rest? Isn't the problem of selection essentially cruel, even barbarous? What librarian of a major library would want the responsibility of preserving some books and consigning the others to oblivion? While I am only a soon-to-be-graduate of U.T. Austin's Preservation and Conservation Studies program, perhaps a real "librarian of a major library" who has "the responsibility of preserving some books and consigning the others to oblivion" would care to inform Mr. Kauffmann and The New Republic about library preservation and our "relatively" easy access to funding. Given that TNR is essentially a political journal, perhaps the current worries about NEH funding for such efforts might be worth a mention. Their addresses are: The New Republic 1220 19th Street Washington, DC 20036 editors [at] tnr__com JD Henry Student, U.T. Austin GSLIS PCS *** Conservation DistList Instance 8:67 Distributed: Thursday, February 23, 1995 Message Id: cdl-8-67-005 ***Received on Tuesday, 21 February, 1995