Subject: Deferral of monograph binding
We have been routinely not binding new paperbacks for a long time, and the results have not been as bad as we had feared. The decision was made strictly on financial grounds. Paperbacks are sent to the stacks with minimal processing. Circulation staff hold deteriorated books for review by the Preservation Office. Tattered paperbacks which are still in good enough condition to bind are reviewed by subject bibliographers, who have the option of weeding any titles which they no longer want in the collection. Between 1% and 3% of books circulated in any given year fit in this category, i.e. tattered enough to need commercial binding and still able to stand the process. We are finding an increasing number of paperbacks which are tattered, printed on paper of reasonable quality, but have such narrow gutter margins that binding would be impossible. We will probably have to consider some sort of stiffening process for books in this category. Maybe this would be a reasonable solution to UFL's problem. Sara Williams sw981 [at] ALBNYVMS__BITNET University Libraries University at Albany SUNY Albany, New York *** Conservation DistList Instance 4:24 Distributed: Thursday, November 1, 1990 Message Id: cdl-4-24-002 ***Received on Monday, 29 October, 1990