[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AV Media Matters] CD-R vs. R-DAT
I am glad that I posted my earlier message. I had, in the case of
R-DAT vs. CD-R, sort of settled on thinking about it as I had learned in
the class I mentioned. It is valuable to receive other information,
especially as a student interested in this very matter.
On Fri, 3 May 2002 email@example.com wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > I recently took a course, Basics in Audio Preservation and
> > here at the University of Texas at Austin, as part of my archives
> > cirriculum. In this class we covered this very issue, CD-R vs.
> > While many people are using R-DATs for their preservation copies of
> > sound
> > recordings, they pose a serious problem.
> > Since R-DATs are a helical scan tape technology, the tracks are
> > as diagonal stripes along the tape. The fundamental perservation
> > in
> > this is that stored data at any given point along a track, since it
> > not linear, differs so much from the data on the neighboring track.
> > This can then cause migration, as the polarities will attempt to
> > and information lost will have a much bigger effect on the integrity
> > of the DAT tape than it would a tape with linear tracks. So, it
> > as though CD-Rs are a wiser choice for preservation purposes.
> > I hope this helps.
> > Molly Wheeler
> > Student, University of Texas at Austin
> > Moderators Comment:
> > Well you need to talk to your professor - and tell him/her that
> > all recordings these days are helical, and that almost all
> > these days don't have guard bands between tracks (space between
> > and therefore have one magnetic area right next to another and
> > furthermore use azimuth recording techniques which mean that tracks
> > laid up right against one another. But almost NO recordings have
> > that spontaneously move around and change polarity. T there are many
> > techniques used to spread the data and make it redundant so that
> > loss is recoverable, but usually the loss is not the type you
> > anyhow. Magnetic fields generally don't "migrate" unless there is a
> > reason to. You might consider print through a migration of sorts,
> > is not the type of migration you mention, but it is an artifact
> > area of high energy is in DIRECT proximity/contact with an area of
> > energy. The migration (or lack thereof) will also depend on the
> > coercivity of the tape being used. Most modern media is high
> > which means that a relatively strong field is needed to reverse an
> > existing field of magnetic energy on a tape. So if a positively
> > particle is next to a negatively biased one - on a high coercivity
> > - it will be very unusual for either to just change polarity. BUT
> > said all that. There is no question that CD'r are the choice because
> > alternative is almost an obsolete format - clearly endangered.
> > Right answer - wrong reason. But don't tangle with the prof.
> > send him/her to me!! We don't want you're "A" for the course to
> > spontaneously turn into a "B" - or for that matter the prof's
> > to go from $5,000 to $500 after it was stored for a while would we??
> > Jim lindner
> We tested 4 mm and 8 mm helical scan tapes for several years, and
> with Jim. One problem with tape is that read/write heads are
> High head velocities can result in head clogs that adversely affect
> drive or can damage small regions of the tape. Longevity tests use
> repeated write/read passes over the same area, and subsequent
> tests clearly show errors from debris that has piled up at both ends
> the longevity test area. Helican scan tapes use complex Reed-Solomon
> Product Code error detection and correction that can handle most
> but archival risks are present.
> Media Sciences, Inc.
This email was sent to: email@example.com
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP8EW.bWciq7
Or send an email to: AV-Media-Mattersfirstname.lastname@example.org
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!