[Table of Contents]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Decca/London phase 4 stereo series

Well, I compared the sound of the two "Film Spectacular Vol. 3" from London and from Decca both appear to have the same matrix numbers and the Decca definitely has a more detailed sound to my ears, ancient as they might be.
I would add, however, that both are eminently listenable and far in advance, sound wise, of many other brands.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Cox" <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Decca/London phase 4 stereo series

On 22/06/2009, Goran Finnberg wrote:

Interestingly I have read that the
Decca phase 4 records are preferred
to the London pressings for sound quality.

When I have spoken to DECCA about this, John Dunkerly is one source, they were adamant that London and DECCA pressings were all done in England thus exactly the same.

In rare cases a master tape copy was used for a foreign release but in
most cases pressing stampers were sent if there was a need for a swift

I have compared the matrix numbers on many London releases with their
DECCA releases and they are the same so far after more than a few
hundred comparisons so far during some 35 years of listening and
looking and I cannot hear any difference.

The reason given for doing it this way was for keeping the quality up.

DECCA always used the original edited master tape as the source for
the Neumann cutter as they felt that the quality loss from using a
copy tape was not acceptable at all to them.

And presumably the "Original Masters" CDs are also digitised from the
original edited master tapes.

Regards -- Don Cox doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4178 (20090622) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]