[Table of Contents]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Virgin Sacrifice

Tom makes a really solid point about the issue of copyright. Particularly with old labels having sub-labels in them. For instance, I was sifting through my 45s yesterday and found a Geater Davis single on the House of Orange label. Just for simple curiosity, I looked up who owned the House of Orange label and found nothing. Basically, the only thing I can assume is that it is somehow related to the labels that originated the Philadelphia International label because it has a cover of a Jerry Butler song.

But, this sort of leads into a different point I was hoping to make. While there is a lot of concern over space and having a ton of "stuff," I think it's also important to note that the majority of music that was placed on vinyl, was never put on CD. I think there are some estimates of 50-60%, which means that, while downloads are more convenient and space-friendly, completely dropping all these records all together means we're shedding off some aspect of history. Whether it's valuable or not, well, that's a different matter that's determined by collectors and music aficionados. Which, I think Jack, pointed out with his 78 collection.

One route some groups have made is basically making very secure Bit Torrent systems, then uploading their albums to it for a small group of people to join in. To join in, people must submit stuff on a regular basis or they're kicked out. That way obscure stuff can still exist without it being completely leeched or available by someone with a really slow collection. But, then again, that's a little clandestine. ;)

-
Gary Powell

Tom Fine wrote:
Hi Jack:

Your situation is somewhat unique, perhaps so unique that there is not even a niche market for it in the modern download world. However, you raise a good point -- all the material that is currently out of print, sometimes called "long-tail content." I've argued numerous times on this list and in other forums that all of it should eventually be available as downloads. There is, however, some cost involved with digitizing old material and some masters are forever lost. The biggest block, though, to getting the more obscure stuff online is copyright laws. Stuff stays copyright in the US far too long, especially if it's out of print. I've argued that there should be a requirement for copyrights to last beyond what the rest of the world finds reasonable, that the material should have to be in print in a common consumer format or the copyright expires. If you didn't have the copyright laws, much much more variety of material would be online for legal download, put there by fans and collectors or a guy willing to sell his amateur transfers for a quarter or a dime a song. It would be great for consumers because it would probably drive download prices down, as well as offering a "longer tail" of obscure sub-genre stuff than is now legally available.

Your point illustrates the main weakness of the current music business model, and it was also touched on by Mike Biel about record stores in the years before they all collapsed -- a lack of variety is widely toxic to the business. It causes a general dissatisfaction among the more mainstream consumers ("who cares, there's nothing new or interesting there, just the same old stuff") and stymies those who want to "go deep in the stacks" and really learn about a genre or artist. A sure way for a stores buyer traffic to dry up.

Finally, my point wasn't about unique collections like what yours obviously was (since you were able to sell it). Hence my sentence about Black Patty and Shaded Dog disks and McIntosh equipment. My point was about what most of us have for collections, myself included. Roomfuls of heavy and mostly worthless stuff, shelves of common records and CD's, boxes of common and/or not-good-condition 78's, with a subset of a small amount of the volume that's truly valuable. As time goes on, many of us will find that even this subset won't raise enough dough for our survivors to dispose of the mass of dumpster fodder. And I think these dreams of libraries, universities and archives suddenly springing up to collect and preserve all this are pipe dreams, given likely economic conditions and general cultural disinterest in anything "old" going forward.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Palmer" <vdalhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Virgin Sacrifice


Tom,
I certainly qualify as an old man. I'm even older than Mike! But even if I was willing to download the music only I could not obtain the artist and the music I want. It is only available from old 78s. Most of it has never been released on CD or even LP. So where does that leave me? Either look for the old records or forget the music I want to hear? So my choice is looking for the records. And I enjoy it. I have met so many interesting people and traveled across the entire US looking for the music. I can't travel anymore due to health problems but I still check out several mail order lists and on line listings. I feel I am doubly blessed. I get to hear the music and I also have the original artifact that the music was issued on. You have to be a record collector (of any age) to know what it is like. Jack

----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Fine" <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Virgin Sacrifice


Hi Mike:

No offense, but your attitude about downloads shows your age. There are definitely a few "kids" who want a houseful of dusty objects, but I respect just as much the person who is collecting the MUSIC, not the THING, in which case an iPod full of downloads is more MUSIC in a more convenient place than ever existed before. Now if only that music were in full CD quality or better instead of lossy-compressed ...

Since we can't take either one with us, it might be more merciful on those we leave behind to leave a single computer drive and iPod vs. a house of moldy things to be disposed of. On the other hand, if it's a house full of minty Black Pattys, Shaded Dogs and McIntosh amplifiers, perhaps the survivors will forgive the clutter as the cash rolls in from selling it! But this isn't usually the case. I think there are guys on this list who appraise giant piles of shellac and vinyl all the time and will report how worthless many acres of this stuff is, so mainly it's a burden on those left behind unless they share the love of the stuff or own a carting business.

As for used bookstores, except for my strange inclination to collect first edition hardcovers of certain mainstream books about politics and journalism, I've had much better luck and saved tons of money using AbeBooks. So once again, the Internet wins. Aside from books about music and the record business, I've stopped buying altogether due to lack of space. Library trumps wallet nowadays.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Biel" <mbiel@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Virgin Sacrifice


From: "Tom Fine" <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Maybe it's an age thing, but I can't see any reason for physical stores
for music since Amazon took off. I haven't bought a book or CD from a
physical store in probably a decade now. 

To a certain extent that is similar to me, especially when I am home in
Kentucky, far, far away from any record stores with just a small
non-discount bookstore in town.  Constantly when something is discussed
in these forums or I otherwise hear about something available, I check
on Amazon and a couple of other places and ZIP, I click and buy.  The
problem is not being able to combine shipping in the marketplace area,
which raises the price considerably when buying several things that the
same vendor offers.

But that being said, when visiting Leah in NYC we always try to drop
into Acadamy Records, Book-Off, Strand Books, and a neat remainder book
place we found in the Village, and we usually leave these places with
too many things to carry, so I usually drive there. Then there are the
special events like the semi- and annual sales at places like the
ARChive of Contemporary Music that Leah and I hit this afternoon. We
crawled out with almost 100 one dollar LPs, almost 50 two dollar
LaserDiscs, and some 50 cent 78s including two Chaillapin Opera Discs,
Jazz at the Philharmonic Vol 4 on Disc album 504, Artie Shaw plays Cole
Porter on Musicraft album S2, King Cole Trio Capitol album B8 with an
extra disc, and Tetrazzini on the vinyl Heritage Series 15-0001, and
some other stuff including two Hoffnung books. (The sale continues thru
Sunday, so if you're in the NYC area you might want to check it out
http://www.arcmusic.org ) And then there's the Jazz Record Bash on Fri
and Sat, and everybody will be there. And then there's the Antique
Phonograph and Record shop in South Jersey we went to last Saturday
while in the Phila area and got a couple dozen 78s there.

There is nothing like being able to handle and inspect the records,
including the ones you don't buy, which can't be done on the internet
nor in mail auctions. While 78 collectors have been using mail auctions
since the 1930s, most of these collectors have also gone thru tens of
thousands of records in stores, so they get to know what the details are
in the actual records. I know I have looked at more than a million
records over the years. This is an important learning experience for
collectors. When the rock collectors started having access to mail
auctions in the late 70s in Goldmine and other magazines like it, I
noticed that the majority of rock collectors had never really gone thru
piles of thousands of records, and usually knew nothing about the
records themselves. Reading the articles in these rock collector
magazines, looking at what they mistakenly called "discographies", and
the auction lists themselves, showed how ignorant these rock collectors
were, even the "experts". All too often they had never looked at any
records that were not already in their collection. They didn't know
labels, pressing plant styles, matrix numbers, etc. Obvious conterfeits
were snapped up like the real things by them if they ventured out to a
record show.


And downloads trump even that because not only are they convenient,
they are near-instant gratification.  Now if only full 44.1/16-bit
downloads would go down to 99 cents or less per song and be
commonplace, we'd finally be at a reasonable "new paradigm."


So if these "collectors" now stick to just downloading things, that
might leave the real artifacts for us real collectors. I'm not
interested in paying for vapor, which is all a download is.  We did use
some free streams as source for some of the music in Leah's documentary
because most of the music was added while I was in New York and my
records were in Kentucky.  I do buy plenty of CD reissues of 78s, so I
am not a purist who insists on having the 78 even if it is impossibly
rare.  But if the reissue is on a CD or a download, I will go for the
CD.  You are not a record collector if you go for the download.  (In
Leah's documentary, Kurt Nauck discusses the difference between music
lovers who just want to listen to the music, and record collectors who
want the record and also might listen to the record.)

Mike Biel mbiel@xxxxxxxxx



[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]