[ARSCLIST] Robert Johnson RPM debate

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Robert Johnson RPM debate
From: james mendenhall <james.mendenhall@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:30:07 -0700
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <2B92E587-AAC8-4910-8EE0-AE8E9209DFB4@GMAIL.COM>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Hi, Arsclist I am doing research about the rpm debate of the Robert Johnson recordings. Does anyone have any information for me? And, is this all speculation or has there been proof found that they are indeed too fast?

thanks

james

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Robert Johnson RPM debate
  - From: Malcolm Rockwell

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] SV: [ARSCLIST] DBX for playback of 78s
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Robert Johnson RPM debate
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] DBX noise reduction for playback of 78's?
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Robert Johnson RPM debate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

[ARSCLIST] Robert Johnson RPM debate

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]