[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456 and Shamrock 041 Manufacturing Specs?



Hi Goran:

Even Quantegy-badged 456? I have some of that and some 406, dating from about the late 1990's to the end of Quantegy, and none has misbehaved so far. I just played a reel recorded in 1997 recently and it was all good. I have no faith this will be the same in 10 years. I'll let every know then!

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- From: "Goran Finnberg" <mastering@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456 and Shamrock 041 Manufacturing Specs?



Will Prentice:

Responding to Richard's comment that "all tape
manufacturers seemed to have created batches of
tape which suffered from this [i.e., SSS]"

I have never ever seen any BASF tape ever go sticky shed.


BASF is one of the worlds biggest chemical companies.

They have always claimed that they had all the knowldedge in house
together with making all the ingredients in house.

So their position is that due to the above none of their tapes will
exhibit sticky shed as they knew how to avoid it.

AGFA, it is the same except for some batches of Agfa 468 during half a
year or so.

I have only seen one real of 468 go sticky despite having transferred
several hundred such reals over the years.

In contrast it is almost a given that any reel of Ampex 456 will go
sticky for sure.

And that is true over here since so far they all need baking.


-- Best,

Goran Finnberg
The Mastering Room AB
Goteborg
Sweden

E-mail: mastering@xxxxxxxxx

Learn from the mistakes of others, you can never live long enough to
make them all yourself.    -   John Luther



[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]