Re: [ARSCLIST] Telarc depleted if not dead

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Telarc depleted if not dead
From: Paul D <pdrockton@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:16:27 -0500
In-reply-to: <70F6F69DED02490889C8BD4502E04DD8@TOMOFFICE>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <8CB5B3C02590261-730-3655@mblk-d45.sysops.aol.com>
References: <1C428BDEE2C6934AAAF8618C5594B078010982BE@COAEVS3.coacd.org> <70F6F69DED02490889C8BD4502E04DD8@TOMOFFICE>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

I live in Cleveland. WCLV used to proudly include the fact that a classical?piece was a Telarc production. They did have a superior sound and I really think they helped the Cleveland Orchestra become Internationally recognized. All things being the same, the orchestra with the best recording wins.

Paul

http://goprokaraoke.blogspot.com/





-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Fine <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 3:08 pm
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Telarc depleted if not dead


http://stereophile.com/news/once_telarc_now_five-four/?

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Muzak is bankrupt
  - From: Schooley, John
- [ARSCLIST] Telarc depleted if not dead
  - From: Tom Fine

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Good idea, dumb business model so far -- soapbox
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Good idea, dumb business model so far -- soapbox
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Good idea, dumb business model so far -- soapbox
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Muzak is bankrupt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Telarc depleted if not dead

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]