Re: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: Sticky AGFA PEM 469

[Tom Fine <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

By the way, on another extreme are mass-market magazines like EQ and Mix and Electronic Musician who 
are vague about what tapes to bake or outright advocate baking all "old" tapes. This is completely 
wrong and a tape should only be baked or otherwise treated if it is known defective. Richard Hess 
will clarify, but I am pretty sure that the _vast_ majority of pre-1970 tapes hold up just fine over 
time and indeed will be damaged by baking or other treatments (apparently some early types suffer 
loss of lubricant, which is a different problem). And, Scotch 206/207 back-coated tape never 
suffered any problems according to both Del Eilers and Bill Lund formerly of 3M. Furthermore, early 
Ampex black-oxide tape, the non-back-coated types, seems OK, in fact I just recently transferred two 
reels of I think 424 or 434 type from 1969.

The big problem with these mass-market mags is they over-simplify (sometimes due to ignorant 
writers, sometimes due to an editorial mandate to keep things to idiot-simple talking points). In a 
nuanced and complex problem set like what confronts old tapes, this is dangerous and ignorant.

My point is, the most important thing we can do with old tapes is to suss out what type is actually 
in the box, first and before anything action is taken. My experience is that many tapes arrive in 
white boxes or generic boxes and often if there is a tape type label on the box, what's in it is not 
that. And then we have mixed-type reels which are their own special hell. Once we suss out exactly 
what's on the reel, we can then be on the lookout for any problems associated with that kind of 
tape.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Fine" <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 6:26 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: Sticky AGFA PEM 469


> Hi Parker:
>
> Regarding this page:
> http://www.recordist.com/ampex/docs/misc/sticky-shed.html
>
> I think Ampex tape was sticky past the mid-80's, despite some Ampex claims. As I understand it, 
> 406/407/456 was likely to go sticky into the early 90's. Some say ALL of these tapes will 
> eventually go sticky. I have 456 and 406 and 457 from the late 90s and early this decade and so 
> far no problems with sticky. But, it's early ...
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Parker Dinkins" <parker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 10:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: Sticky AGFA PEM 469
>
>
> > on 4/2/08 8:49 PM US/Central, Steven Smolian at smolians@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > There is (was?) a 3M site that lists all the tape product numbers and
> > > indicates their liklihood of getting the dreaded shed.  Del Eilers put the
> > > list together before he moved elsewhere withing the company.
> >
> > Maybe this is list you are referring to -
> >
> > http://www.recordist.com/ampex/docs/misc/sticky-shed.html
> >
> > While Del Eilers' list of 3M tape products can be found here -
> >
> > http://www.recordist.com/ampex/docs/aorprod2.html
> >
> > --
> > Parker Dinkins
> > MasterDigital Corporation
> > Audio Restoration + CD Mastering
> > http://masterdigital.com