Re: [ARSCLIST] LP sized scanner

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] LP sized scanner
From: Graham Newton <gn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:39:12 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <002d01c87b05$98d9e990$6d01a8c0@TOMOFFICE>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <47C8DDF0.7000006@audio-restoration.com>
Organization: Audio Restoration by Graham Newton
References: <208060.35793.qm@web81608.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <000601c87adc$fb932f20$6d01a8c0@TOMOFFICE> <000d01c87ae6$a1618a10$c9c9644c@DELLDOWNSTAIRS> <002001c87ae8$8b944310$6d01a8c0@TOMOFFICE> <002d01c87b05$98d9e990$6d01a8c0@TOMOFFICE>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)

Tom Fine wrote:

Are there any non-ridicu-priced options for a flatbed scanner that can accomodate LP covers (at least 12x12 glass)?

I bought an Epson 836XL scanner a few years ago on E*ay for $600... does the job, but I would suggest you go the copy stand / digital camera route. For a large amount of LP covers, it is probably easier and faster.

... Graham Newton

--
Audio Restoration by Graham Newton, http://www.audio-restoration.com
World class professional services applied to tape or phonograph records for
consumers and re-releases, featuring CEDAR's CAMBRIDGE processes.

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] LP sized scanner
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] LP sized scanner
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] LP sized scanner

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]