[ARSCLIST] Shopping for AD/DA

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Shopping for AD/DA
From: Ganesh.Irelan@xxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:45:53 -0400
Comments: To: ARSCLIST@loc.gov
In-reply-to: <ARSCLIST%200707110000066390.0170@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <45C11E774798F84E8A5172DED617CB3BD12003@sms2.sym.org>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AcfDcBOdvZqEnIImQ5mwm1qoauo8hAASDvKQ
Thread-topic: ARSCLIST Digest - 9 Jul 2007 to 10 Jul 2007 (#2007-185)

A little more background on my usage might help you all get a better idea of our work and get me a more specific recommendation.  I use 24/48K for nearly everything.  However, there are a few music recordings and some spoken word that want to do at 24/96K.  Certainly for the music I feel justified in going with 24/96K when I get such a converter.  My reasoning for the spoken word is that it will require substantial processing in the future and I want to faciliate that by providing larger files to work with. 

I only need a stereo unit with AES I/O.  I use an RME Digi96 card as the computer interface.

Thank you,
Kevin Irelan

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Why new CDs sound worse
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Why new CDs sound worse
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Shopping for AD/DA
Next by thread: [ARSCLIST] Hawaiian 78s Discography now ready to ship
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

[ARSCLIST] Shopping for AD/DA

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]