Re: [ARSCLIST] OS X/Apple (was CEDAR)

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] OS X/Apple (was CEDAR)
From: D P Ingram <darren@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:58:10 +0300
In-reply-to: <002e01c79eed$a6ff3790$0301a8c0@rob>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <C2B4F331-88B5-4531-BFDF-693EE3E922E6@ingram.fi>
References: <002e01c79eed$a6ff3790$0301a8c0@rob>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On 25 maj 2007, at 19.56, Rob Poretti wrote:

But you are right - it's a lot more susceptible then their original proprietary OS. There are pros and cons with open-source, but I don't believe many Mac users would want to go back to pre-Jobs times...

Potentially more suspetible (popularity, OSes are more advanced) but the problems appear to get fixed a lot quicker, there is still no discernable virus/spyware threat etc etc. And it isn't /just/ due to popularity of the OS...

--- Darren Ingram (darren at ingram.fi / www.ingram.fi) Provider of many things including research, media, innovation and consultancy services.

"Insert pointless, humo(u)rless quotation and ASCII art here" "Insert lengthy, boring and meaningless corporate and copyright disclaimer here"

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] OS X/Apple (was CEDAR)
  - From: Don Cox

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Cedar
  - From: Rob Poretti

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cedar
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cedar
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cedar
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] OS X/Apple (was CEDAR)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] OS X/Apple (was CEDAR)

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]