Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 patent dispute

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 patent dispute
From: "Steven C. Barr(x)" <stevenc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:46:14 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <010401c75887$1d9239a0$0100007f@sympatico.ca>
References: <2014961.84761172269635635.JavaMail.servlet@perfora> <000901c7579c$a9df3200$6a01a8c0@TOMOFFICE>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Fine" <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> I'm not prone to seeing as dire a future. Microsoft and Apple will tie this up
in court for a while
> and then pay Lucent some money to go away if it doesn't get outright struck
down along the lines,
> which I'd say is likely.
>
> MP3 is not going anywhere.
>
> Hopefully we'll all be here in 10 years to see if I'm right or wrong.
>
And once again the final score will be: Lawyers 1,000, Corporations
100, Public -67.8...

Steven C. Barr

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 patent dispute
  - From: Bob Olhsson
- Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 patent dispute
  - From: Tom Fine

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 patent dispute
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 patent dispute
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 patent dispute
Next by thread: [ARSCLIST] well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 patent dispute

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]