Re: [ARSCLIST] Interesting Copyright Article

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Interesting Copyright Article
From: Don Cox <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:48:50 +0000
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussi <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <20061028235651.20829.qmail@web38713.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <yam10528.2500.164136472@smtp.ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On 28/10/06, Roger and Allison Kulp wrote:
> http://slate.com/id/2152264

Definitely interesting.

> 
The UK Institute for Public Policy Research has put out a report which
sounds good, but there is no PDF download.

http://www.ippr.org.uk/publicationsandreports/publication.asp?id=495

Summary here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6095612.stm

Unfortunately the US government will probably apply pressure to prevent
the changes in the UK law that are suggested.

Regards
-- 
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Interesting Copyright Article
  - From: Roger and Allison Kulp

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] The Incompetence of Sonny Bono
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Try Real Alternative (was RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company)
Previous by thread: [ARSCLIST] Interesting Copyright Article
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Interesting Copyright Article
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Interesting Copyright Article

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]