Re: [ARSCLIST] Grundig EQ

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Grundig EQ
From: Scott Phillips <scottp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:34:47 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <1CDA3639E0E121409B29360162A504750142BAC7@BLUE-2003.corp.blstk.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AcbpxS1TF6hojKWsTuORxSbjJp7tJAATSMdwAKIa+SA=
Thread-topic: [ARSCLIST] Grundig EQ

<groan> !! 

-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ganesh.Irelan@xxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 8:18 AM
To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Grundig EQ

I wish it was full track, 2 track or even mono quarter track!  This is
one mono track out of 4 completely unrelated tracks on 1/4" tape.  

>>Might try using a o-scope with a 2 track head, just for grins. The
display makes things obvious. That said, 2 track playback of full width
mono isn't optimum... But might give you a very quick way to verify that
there is no top end to get...

Follow-Ups:
- [ARSCLIST] A new definition of "multi-track"--was: Grundig EQ
  - From: Steven C. Barr(x)

Prev by Date: [ARSCLIST] Ediphone Cylinders
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Ediphone Cylinders
Previous by thread: [ARSCLIST] Grundig EQ
Next by thread: [ARSCLIST] A new definition of "multi-track"--was: Grundig EQ
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Grundig EQ

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]