Re: [ARSCLIST] Tape baking question

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Tape baking question
From: Brandon Burke <burke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 23:20:17 -0700
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <LNBBKGMHOBLAJNLMMCKJGEJOGAAA.jwcarroll@mindspring.com>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <1160374817.4529ea21e58a2@webmail.stanford.edu>
References: <LNBBKGMHOBLAJNLMMCKJGEJOGAAA.jwcarroll@mindspring.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.7

Good point..

My reply assumed all stock was poly,
as that was the impression i got from
David's original post.


BB


Quoting Jeff Carroll <jwcarroll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Seems to me you'd put the tape more at risk by trying to separate the
> sections.  Are any obviously acetate?  I'm more inclined to think that
> leaving it as is and baking it would be the safer route.  --JC
>
>


-- 
Brandon Burke
Archivist for Audio Collections
Hoover Institution Archives
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-6010
vox: 650.724.9711
fax: 650.725.3445
email: burke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Tape baking question
  - From: Jeff Carroll

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Tape baking question
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically??
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Tape baking question
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Tape baking question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Tape baking question

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]