[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] ARSCLIST guidelines
By the way, WHERE are the list's contents archived for posterity..at
arsc-audio.org? This is the first mention I've seen of it. 78-L can be found by
going to the site, 78-C and 88sOn78s are on Yahoo, but I've never known where to
find this list's archives. It might be worth posting the house rules every few
months.
dl
Steven Smolian wrote:
> I thought this site was also to announce where records can be found for sale
> but not to list them.
>
> Steve Smolian
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sam Brylawski" <goodlistening@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 6:04 PM
> Subject: [ARSCLIST] ARSCLIST guidelines
>
> > I'd like to resubmit a posting I made last October about the purpose
> > of this list, along with a reminder that its contents are archived for
> > posterity. IMO, retrieving information from the Web is hard enough
> > without having to wade through jokes and irrelevant comments.
> >
> > There is little need to single out particular individuals in this
> > regard. Everyone should please keep in mind the purposes of the
> > ARSClist and assure that submissions are appropriate to a professional
> > listserv. I know *many* people who gave up on 78-L. Please, let's not
> > lose them from this list due to useless posts. There have been some
> > particularly valuable threads the past two weeks. I was pleased to add
> > some contributions by Eric Jacobs and Richard Hess to my "permanant"
> > archives. Thanks to you all.
> >
> > From October, 2005:
> >
> > This is a good time to review the purposes of ARSCLIST and re-post the
> > guidelines. The Board of ARSC met last Saturday and there was some
> > discussion about this list and the amount of "noise" on it. We risk
> > losing valuable subscribers if the list becomes cluttered with
> > off-topic, irrelevant, or otherwise inappropriate posts.
> >
> > It is ARSC's intention that ARSClist be a forum for "professional"
> > discussions about recorded sound and that it be open to anyone. The
> > number of subscribers is increasing, fortunately, but that means that
> > we need to be especially careful about extraneous posts to the list.
> > In this category, I would include jokes, politics, non-substantive
> > responses to other posts, and personal communications best written to
> > only one or two people on the list.
> >
> > Some excerpts from the guidelines posted at arsc-audio.org follow.
> >
> > Thanks to all of you. Sam Brylawski
> >
> > The Purpose of the List
> > Topics appropriate for discussion may include discussion about
> > recorded sound research, history, innovations, preservation,
> > archiving, copyrights and access and announcements about ARSC
> > activities and publications. Other lists may be more appropriate
> > forums for subjective discussions of particular recordings or artists,
> > restoration of antique equipment, buying and selling recordings and
> > the collecting of ephemera. All messages posted to the list will be
> > archived permanently. By posting to this list the subscriber agrees to
> > have his or her message become part of the permanent public archive.
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/448 - Release Date: 9/14/2006
> >