Re: [ARSCLIST] ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension
From: Bob Olhsson <olh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:18:04 -0400
Comments: To: ARSCLIST@loc.gov
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <20649419.785631158261484085.JavaMail.servlet@perfora>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Jack Palmer wrote:
>...His performance was paid for and unless 
>he signed a contract giving him  royalties for his performance he never gets 
>another dime.

Make no mistake about the fact that ANY limitation on copyright is a limitation on what composers and artists can earn IN THEIR LIFETIME. Certainly many have given up their rights for a pittance but two wrongs still don't make a right.

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension
Next by thread: [ARSCLIST] Storyville, Dixie Frog
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]