Hey Phillip,
Are you tongue in cheek about the $140 player? If not, I'd like to know what brand/model it is. For that amount, I'd like to try SACD, especially if you say it sounds good.
Rod Stephens
P.S. I've got a Best Buy up the road even though we're a small town.
phillip holmes wrote:
Hey Tom,
Stop picking on me. And the CD player cost $140. And I got it from Best Buy. It also plays SACD and DVDA pretty good. Actually, the SACD playback is fantastic for what it is. I still don't think this CD thing is going to make it. MP3 is going to rule. All you suckers who adopted CD are going to be like all those early adopters of stereo. The joke's on you losers!
Besides, I got my $10,000 turntable for 1/3 of MSRP. I'm no sucker!
Phillip (tongue in cheek, if you couldn't tell).
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Fine" <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Longevity
Yes, this whole fingerprint thing reminds me of the audiophool with the $10K record player and the $50 Chinese Wal-Mart CD player claiming LPs "always" sound better and CDs "always" sound "terrible."
For what it's worth, I borrow, play and sometimes make personal-use copies of circulated library CD's and DVD's all the time. We're talking fingerprints galore and scratches to boot, plus usually some sort of off-center stick-on library label to potentially effect playback mechanics. Never had a problem, using typical consumer DVD players and Plextor drives in the computer. I had a DVD last week ("Battle of Algiers" -- superb movie, highly recommended, DVD reissue is excellent) that had a pinhole chunk chipped out of the edge. It played perfectly -- I tested every bit of the DVD because I was curious if there was a data problem from the chunk. It was all scratched up too.
-- Tom Fine
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerome Hartke" <jhartke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Longevity
Moving away from opinions, our testing laboratory has conducted tests on
both CD and DVD discs containing such defects, both of our own fabrication
and obtained from Philips Laboratories. Results are as described in my
initial contribution.
Simple fingerprints should never interfere with playback unless the read
drive is of very poor quality. The real risk of fingerprints is in the oils
from the body. Those of each person are distinct, and some can degrade discs
over an extended period of time.
Jerry Media Sciences, Inc. http://www.mscience.com/
-----Original Message----- From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alex Hartov Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 5:58 PM To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Longevity
That is part of the hype. You try it. I know from experience that a simple finger print will mess up playback on either CD or DVD. I don't know where the notion of a whole in the CD/DVD being recoverable comes from but it's definitely nonsense.
Alex
On Jul 2, 2006, at 5:31 PM, phillip holmes wrote:
>> CD and DVD error detection and correction algorithms will "play" >> discs with >> 2 mm diameter holes. Some DVD systems require a 6 mm defect before >> data loss >> occurs, and the problem is then loss of servo lock by the read >> drive. Can >> 78s do this?