Re: [ARSCLIST] Archiving at double speed

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Archiving at double speed
From: Don Cox <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:29:50 +0000
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussi <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <45C11E774798F84E8A5172DED617CB3B0E9FB1@sms2.sym.org>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <yam10403.2519.155610392@smtp.ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On 23/06/06, Ganesh.Irelan@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> there are plenty of other reasons *not* to use
> double-speed digitization.
> 
> You all have been most solicitous in your responses to this idea. A
> real tribute to the professionals on this list. I knew as soon as I
> pressed "send" that it was a bad idea, even though the stuff I am
> working with is of minimal quality. Its just that there is SO MUCH to
> do!

If it is of minimal quality, then you can't afford to lose any more
quality.

Some words that are now barely audible could become inaudible.

Regards
-- 
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Archiving at double speed
  - From: Richard L. Hess

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Archiving at double speed
  - From: Ganesh . Irelan

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Why sticky shed happened
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] Delamination on Aluminum base laquer disc
Previous by thread: [ARSCLIST] Archiving at double speed
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Archiving at double speed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Archiving at double speed

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]