Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.
From: Don Cox <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:41:26 +0000
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussi <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <00c301c69392$b80dd3a0$6b01a8c0@TOMOFFICE>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <yam10396.1328.162335120@smtp.ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On 19/06/06, Tom Fine wrote:
> Don't spend too much, it appears to be a semi-submerged format
> already.

The Gramophone is listing a couple of dozen new classical releases in
SACD per month. 

I don't have any figures for non-classical.

The expensive part would be the five (or three) channels of amp and
speaker, which you will need for any type of surround sound. 

The player need not be expensive, although a cheap one may need a buffer
amp for good sound if its output impedance is too high.

Regards
-- 
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.
  - From: Tom Fine

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.
  - From: Tom Fine

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]