Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and Marston Records

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and Marston Records
From: Bob Olhsson <olh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:29:39 -0500
Comments: To: ARSCLIST@loc.gov
Message-id: <22038860.75271142544586575.JavaMail.servlet@perfora>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

>I hope details will be forthcoming, especially if they can serve as a 
>badly needed licensing model for US companies.
>

There are no US companies for the early stuff and little need for a licensing model because Sony/BMG owns everything EMI doesn't and they both own a lot of it jointly. Universal kicks in during the '30s.

Independent label ownership only begins in the '40s when the last of the electrical recording patents expired.

-- 
Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN
Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control
Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined!
615.385.8051    http://www.hyperback.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and Marston Records
  - From: steven c
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and Marston Records
  - From: David Lennick

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Disc extractions
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and Marston Records
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] [78-l] Copyright and Marston Records
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and Marston Records
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and Marston Records

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]