[Table of Contents]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] And now for something completely different...

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] And now for something completely different...
From: JPPiano@xxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:16:24 EST
Comments: To: ARSCLIST@loc.gov
Message-id: <1a7.48f5fb65.31307d48@aol.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Hi, All

I cant vouch for the Marantz CF recorder mic pres, but the ones in their old 
analog portables were quite terrible. The Sound Devices are quite good - not 
up to the level of top of the line stand alones, but top notch for a built in 
pre. One thing worth mentioning about the 722 and 744 is that they can record 
redundantly to CF and the internal HD simultaneously-=

Follow-Ups:
- [ARSCLIST] CF recorders and mic pre quality
  - From: Matt Sohn

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] And now for something completely different...
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Question re DuoDisc records
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] And now for something completely different...
Next by thread: [ARSCLIST] CF recorders and mic pre quality
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]