Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology
From: Don Cox <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:41:45 +0000
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussi <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <017301c61d79$726afba0$0f57fea9@interlinks.net>
Message-id: <yam10247.2263.154877272@smtp.ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On 20/01/06, steven c wrote:

> So, on a regular CD (not recordable)...could the protective plastic
> layer be removed without affecting the pressed surface (which I
> assume would be underneath the protective layer...right?). Or,
> do the two plastics bond together in such a way that one cannot
> be separated from the other?

The layer next to the pressed surface is the metallic coating. 

Regards
-- 
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology
  - From: steven c

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]