[Table of Contents]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
From: David Lennick <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:38:43 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
Message-id: <43D10403.E4693AC9@sympatico.ca>
References: <s3d0b834.097@gwia201.syr.edu>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Robert Hodge wrote:

> I've never encounterd that one....
>
> What was 8 rpm used for , what size disc  and what groove size ?  It must be spoken word. Embossed or cut groove ?
>
> Bob Hodge

Those flexi Talking Books wee 8rpm, I believe.

dl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
  - From: Steven Smolian

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
  - From: Robert Hodge

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] Wire Tap Tapes of Linda Tripp
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]