[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more



Well, I think you guys who want to preserve "everything" (which I don't see as realistic but I do admire you very much for trying) need to set realistic standards. Are those cassettes with field interviews of the rural quilting club really worth 96/24 transfers and a complex state-of-the-art transfer chain? Maybe, but is it practical and wouldn't it be better to consider something "lesser" (I put it in quotes because 99.99% of the future population won't hear an iota of difference) and get more of the cassettes transferred and readily available? I observe that one of the biggest problems I see in groups (institutions) sitting on large analog collections is what's known as analysis paralysis -- know there's a problem, endlessly study solutions in search of the non-existent perfect solution, and never actually DO anything, or come up with a too-complex/too-expensive solution that cannot be funded or maintained. This is akin to when federal grants were out there to put in "computer labs" in public schools -- a check would come in, a bunch of computers would be dumped in a room and two years later no one would be on payroll who could keep them working. My point about analog tape is, again, that it's actually not "permanent" as some folklure would indicate, so some sort of transfer should be made before it's rendered unplayable. I'll come back one more time to the "how" question -- where there is a will there is a way and otherwise the material simply won't be preserved.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- From: <Mwcpc6@xxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:37 PM
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more



Tom Fine wrote:
Despite optimistic statements and predictions, I think ALL content of
importance on analog reel to reel tape should be transferred to a
managed digital archive system in the next couple of decades.
In a message dated 1/19/2006 10:13:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
stevenc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
handwritten notes, old
sound recordings (usually in obsolete formats) and the like
are generally consigned to the landfill, ocean, incinerator
or whatever...

Meanwhile, those of us with a historic bent are left thinking
"I wonder why nobody saved..."
********************************

We have two completely different groups here with totally different
perspectives.

Those in commercial audio were paid good money to produce their material and
can see the possibility of making more from it in the future, even if only
from the $1.00 bins at Walmart. They have no problem assuming that all of their
work can be preserved in managed archives financed by the future value of the
material itself.

Archivists, on the other hand, feel that there is a moral value in preserving
the total record of human existence, even if it will be of no interest to
anybody until it reaches the status of George Washington's grocery list. Lack of
financing leaves them to their own devices in the hope that the material that
interests them will survive indefinitely without any management whatsoever.

I, and I think a few others on this list, am in the second category. Thus the
interest in permanent media and preservation of existing media in spite of
the lack of sympathy from the professional audio side.

Mike Csontos



[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]