Re: [ARSCLIST] 78rpm EQ and postprocessing

["Steven C. Barr" <stevenc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Phillips" <scottp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Clearly I vote for #3 as well, since it allows the use by others of
> options #1 and #2 at any time in the future FROM option #3. At the very
> least, it allows the most options for the future, including improvements
> in processing technology that will certainly occur over the years.
> Having only the results of #1 and #2 left after the original media
> crumbles to dust doesn't give you many options to work with. 
> 
Well, from what I've seen shellac 78's don't seem likely to crumble
into dust (or otherwise degrade) barring fire, flood or being dropped.
I have near-mint 78's that are approaching their first century of
existence that look (and play) as well as they probably ever did!

Steven C. Barr