Re: [ARSCLIST] 78rpm EQ and postprocessing

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] 78rpm EQ and postprocessing
From: Lou Judson <inaudio@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:11:00 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <1CDA3639E0E121409B29360162A50475BC7631@BLUE-2003.corp.blstk.com>
Message-id: <3470243da4c04208d6e18fcff8cc41f5@pacbell.net>
References: <1CDA3639E0E121409B29360162A50475BC7631@BLUE-2003.corp.blstk.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Just for perspective, the demo that started this discussion can be thought of as just that, a demo that shows what you can do with the product - if they stopped before removing all non-musical sounds, would prospective buyers think it had limited capability? Those of us who know can see the ability to overuse it clearly.

2c,

Lou Judson • Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Nov 23, 2005, at 9:47 AM, Scott Phillips wrote:

Indeed I do understand. Always it is reality, commercial or otherwise, colliding with ideals I guess. The facts of life, still some moderation would be in order.

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] 78rpm EQ and postprocessing
  - From: Scott Phillips

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] 78rpm EQ and postprocessing
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] Kastlemusick Monthly Bulletin
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] 78rpm EQ and postprocessing
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] 78rpm EQ and postprocessing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] 78rpm EQ and postprocessing

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]