[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] 78rpm cartridges and postprocessing
- To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] 78rpm cartridges and postprocessing
- From: David Lennick <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:04:13 -0500
- Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
- Message-id: <4380D6BD.E0BF3A2D@sympatico.ca>
- References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAHRga3jFKDlFmb/EUhW0gnrCgAAAEAAAAJSp3Ru4vzRAs9JcZIT0rB4BAAAAAA==@scarlet.be>
- Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
Shure SC-35 cartridge (stereo) with an SS78E stylus, if you can find one. I
don't recommend the after-market versions of that stylus and the N78S is
useless.
dl
Jos Van Dyck wrote:
> What cartridges would you recommend for 78 transcriptions?
>
> Shure M78S
> Stanton 681 + D6827 stylus
> Ortofon OM78, Concorde 78
> Grado 78C, 78E
> EMT TND65, OFD65 (mono)
>
> Most modern cartridges have stereo output. The EMT MC cartridges are mono.
> Which is better for postprocessing?
> Pros/cons for stereo vs. mono cartridge?
>
> Jos