Re: [ARSCLIST] VPI Vs. Nitty Gritty

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] VPI Vs. Nitty Gritty
From: Charles Lawson <clawson@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:27:40 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <s3736191.054@loc.gov>
Message-id: <fc.0010c7b201c0adcf3b9aca003997e818.1c0ae26@weta.com>
References: <s3736191.054@loc.gov>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Gompers wrote:
>>>> gompers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 11/10/05 2:09 PM >>>
>I'm looking into the nitty gritty 2.5. Could anyone tell me their  
>experiences with the VPI 16.5 since it's in the same price range?
>(I'm too lazy to wash my discs in the sink)

I have had excellent results with the VPI 16.5.  It is important not to be
too aggressive with that brush on vinyl, though, lest you get swishing as a
result.

Generally, the VPI machine is terrific at getting that deep-down crud and,
combined with a new stylus or laser turntable, gives spectacular results.

Chas.

--
Charles Lawson <clawson@xxxxxxxx>
Recording/Production/Broadcast Engineer
WETA Radio <http://www.weta.org/fm/>
Washington, DC

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] VPI Vs. Nitty Gritty
  - From: James L Wolf

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] VPI Vs. Nitty Gritty
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] VPI Vs. Nitty Gritty
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] VPI Vs. Nitty Gritty
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] VPI Vs. Nitty Gritty
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] VPI Vs. Nitty Gritty

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]