Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
From: Mike Richter <mrichter@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:17:58 -0700
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <b4ffcd60a1ee5aff52283a5cf02b374c@pacbell.net>
Message-id: <430EB416.40704@cpl.net>
References: <1CDA3639E0E121409B29360162A504759FBED2@BLUE-2003.corp.blstk.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0508251209180.29948@larry.cc.utexas.edu> <b4ffcd60a1ee5aff52283a5cf02b374c@pacbell.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

Lou Judson wrote:

!!! But I am not really surprised.

With all the new Compact Flash recorders coming out, might the CF be a permanent, no moving parts storage medium? Or are they too fragile and temporaneous as hard drives are?

Lou

My understanding (no reference available) is that flash memory has substantially more rapid decay than optical media.

Mike
--
mrichter@xxxxxxx
http://www.mrichter.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
  - From: Lou Judson
- Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
  - From: Russ Hamm

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
  - From: Scott Phillips
- Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
  - From: Karl Miller
- Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
  - From: Lou Judson

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]