[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity



James,

Check the history of the Kalmus orchestra parts with the Music Divisioon- or
Joe Boonin, on the MLA list.  I'm sending him a copy as well.

Joe- this relates to the recapture of copyrights for music, not just
recordings.


----- Original Message ----- From: "David Lennick" <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 2:27 PM Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity


I believe that the way "It's a Wonderful Life" was returned to copyrighted
status was through the music cues.

(Totally overrated movie, by the way..it puts me to sleep when it doesn't
make me throw up, so now I don't have to be inundated with cheap versions
of it at every turn.)

dl

James L Wolf wrote:

If Jeff and dl are right, then the ONLY copyrightable element is that
stereo mix. Not the cartoons and not the original soundtracks. Those
weasels try to be tricky. But, if the cartoons really fell into the
Public Domain, anybody has the same right to manipulate the original
cartoons and/or soundtracks in any way they want, even to issue
competeing DVDs if they can find the sources.

Steve mentioned some copyrights being retrieved, but that was in Europe.
I've never heard of a legitamate PD item being retrieved/recaptured in
the US.

My opinions only, not official LOC, blah blah blah.

James

>>> dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx 06/20/05 11:58 AM >>>
Jeff Willens wrote:

>         Hope this doesn't sound TOO strange, but didn't Warner Bros.
> let several of their Looney Tunes/Merrie Melodies cartoons lapse into
> public domain? And didn't they re-copyright them all in the 90s?
> Notice how you don't see them on cheapo videotapes and DVDs anymore, or
> running on independent TV stations as they did in the 70s. I seem to
> remember at the end of the re-copyrighted versions (the ones on their
> new DVDs), there's a notice that says something like "Dubbed Version c.
> 1995 Warner Brothers". Would these just pertain to the films being
> remastered and the remaster itself being copyrighted?

Could this refer to a new audio mix? Seems to me that if a soundtrack is
now in stereo, that would definitely constitute a new copyrightable
element. (Speaking of which, MGM's "Band Wagon" sounds fantastic on the
new DVD, and all the numbers are in well-balanced new stereo.)

dl


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.8/22 - Release Date: 6/17/2005




-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.8/22 - Release Date: 6/17/2005


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]