Re: [ARSCLIST] Do these tapes need to be baked or not?

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Do these tapes need to be baked or not?
From: "Edward A. Falk" <falk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:37:37 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <OFC4FB9BD4.4FBCABEE-ON85256F69.00024136-85256F69.0002F03D@american.edu>; from dick@WAMU.ORG on Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 16:25:59 -0800
Message-id: <20041213183737.GI29511@redtail.peregrine>
References: <OFC4FB9BD4.4FBCABEE-ON85256F69.00024136-85256F69.0002F03D@american.edu>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On 2004.12.12 16:25 Dick Spottswood wrote:
> If I'd knowed you was comin', I'd have baked a tape, baked a tape, baked a
> tape...
> Dick

http://www.tangible-technology.com/tape/baking1.html

Probably the definitive article on the subject.  Plus, it's title
goes well with the previous post.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Do these tapes need to be baked or not?
  - From: David Lewiston

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Do these tapes need to be baked or not?
  - From: Dick Spottswood

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] New CD Report NIST
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Do these tapes need to be baked or not?
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Do these tapes need to be baked or not?
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Do these tapes need to be baked or not?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Do these tapes need to be baked or not?

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]