Re: [ARSCLIST] CDR media longevity

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CDR media longevity
From: Konrad Strauss <konrad.strauss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:09:07 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <000401c3e0d9$1df18b40$f4850b51@oemcomputer>
Message-id: <BC35FA83.DAA9%konrad.strauss@insightbb.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0

on 1/22/04 6:15 AM, Jos Van Dyck at jos.van.dyck@xxxxx wrote:

> The problem IS with the unstable media quality. Some batches are OK, others
> are extremely bad. Where can we find a reliable source for 1x media?

This may be true, but it is most likely a combination of factors - writer
and media. Try the Verbatim Vinyl music only CD-Rs. These seem to perform
very well at 1x. And they look like 45s!

--
Konrad Strauss
Recording * Editing * Mastering * Production
http://php.indiana.edu/~kstrauss

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] CDR media longevity
  - From: Jos Van Dyck

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Archive the hard drive, was CDR media longevity
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Archive the hard drive, was CDR media longevity
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] CDR media longevity
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] CDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] CDR media longevity

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]