Re: [ARSCLIST] Audio Editing Software Options

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Audio Editing Software Options
From: "Edward A. Falk" <falk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:07:37 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
Comments: cc: ARSCLIST@sun8.loc.gov
In-reply-to: <yam9474.715.159711112@smtp.ntlworld.com>; from doncox@ENTERPRISE.NET on Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 04:25:14 -0800
Message-id: <20031210160737.GA17468@redtail.peregrine>
References: <yam9474.715.159711112@smtp.ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On 2003.12.10 04:25 Don Cox wrote:
> On 09/12/03, Thomas Caw wrote:
> > I don't know if it is "pro" enough for some folks, but I think
> > Audacity <http://audacity.sourceforge.net/> would suffice for editing
> > oral history/ethnographic interviews.
>
> Is it stable and reliable?

Yes.  I'm writing my own editor right now, but it's not finished.  When I'm
not using my own, I'm using Audacity -- it's pretty much the best of the free
audio editors.

        -ed falk

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Audio Editing Software Options
  - From: Don Cox

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Edison Ediphone
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] Video degeneration
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Audio Editing Software Options
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Audio Editing Software Options
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Audio Editing Software Options

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]