Re: [ARSCLIST] Heavily distorted signal

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Heavily distorted signal
From: Mike Richter <mrichter@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:57:04 -0700
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
Comments: cc: ARSCLIST@sun8.loc.gov
In-reply-to: <EBEDLNFGBPBFHCALALDKGEDDCNAA.trescott@umich.edu>
Message-id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030417005354.00a9c0a0@mail.cpl.net>
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030416113852.00a93848@mail.cpl.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

At 10:46 PM 4/16/2003 -0700, Paul T. Jackson wrote:

I've lost the original post, but has anyone used audio forensic software?
Here is one outfit and there is at least one other in Europe:
http://www.intdevices.com/


Without hearing a sample, it is difficult to guess at the problems of
recovery. I have had the pleasure of recovering quite listenable and even
enjoyable material from sources which were considered hopeless using
relatively low-cost tools. I have heard recovery by experts which puts my
effort to shame.

If the objective is to get intelligible speech and the source is only
routinely bad, simple tools may well be enough.


Mike
mrichter@xxxxxxx
http://www.mrichter.com/

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Heavily distorted signal
  - From: Mike Richter
- [ARSCLIST] Heavily distorted signal
  - From: Paul T. Jackson

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Heavily distorted signal
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] digitalization of oral history collections
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Heavily distorted signal
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Heavily distorted signal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Heavily distorted signal

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]