Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Burners

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Burners
From: Don Cox <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:02:23 +0000
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussi <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <BA9F903E.CBD0%parker@masterdigital.com>
Message-id: <yam9210.1199.157566624@smtp.enterprise.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On 20/03/03, Parker Dinkins wrote:

> One to One, the mastering and replication magazine, examined this
> issue some time ago and reported that _in_some_CD_players_ bit
> identical audio CDs may sound different

Thanks for that excellent analysis.

I find consistently that CD-R copies sound better than the manufactured
originals on my old Rotel player. The copies are made via a Plextor
drive.

The numbers may well be the same, but practical conversion to analog
audio is not so easy.

Regards
--
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Burners
  - From: Parker Dinkins

Prev by Date: [ARSCLIST] Lubricated tape needed
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] Space Shuttle Recorder - Link to NY Times article
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Burners
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Burners
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Burners

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]