Re: [ARSCLIST] 78 production

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] 78 production
From: Mike Richter <mrichter@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:27:39 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
Comments: cc: Ben White <benwhite@cablerocket.com>
In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030203095124.01de8388@postoffice.swbell.net>
Message-id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030203092533.00a933b0@mail.cpl.net>
References: <005601c2c747$0220baa0$3302a8c0@paddyoconnor.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20030128111816.02937d60@mailhost.library.ucsb.edu>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

At 09:52 AM 2/3/2003 -0600, Kurt Nauck wrote:

If someone can assist this gentleman, please contact him directly. Thanks!

As requested.

From: "Ben White" <benwhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <nauck@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Curious Problem


    Perhaps you could help with a problem we are attempting to solve. Do
you know of any source that still manufactures 78 rpm records? We would be
interested in sourcing this to have a record mass produced in this format.
Any information or direction you could give will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!


While I am not aware of any company which does it for individuals, nor any
in the U.S., Symposium is still pressing 78s in Britain - at least for
Historic Masters Limited. Those are pressed on vinyl, of course, as were
the Historic Masters discs pressed by EMI previously.

Mike
mrichter@xxxxxxx
http://www.mrichter.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] 78 production
  - From: joe@xxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- [ARSCLIST] 78 production
  - From: Kurt Nauck

Prev by Date: [ARSCLIST] 78 production
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] ARSC Newsletter Deadline
Previous by thread: [ARSCLIST] 78 production
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] 78 production
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] 78 production

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]