[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: arsclist Cataloging



Now...
1) The first 264 bytes are numeric; are these one or a set of numbers for 
internal catalog use, and if so do they somehow relate to text-based
lists or do they have meaning for the library staff?
2) The data record apparently represents an album set, not a record...
correct?
3) I note a fair amount of information that doesn't seem to appear (unless
it is in the form of the mysterious numbers mentioned). Does the system
only track work, composer, director, album and disc numbers and the
like, without noting matrix, take (also omitted from the RDI), conditions
(and damage if any), and the like?
4) Is MARC actually a data format (in the sense of being a list of fields
to be used) or are there further considerations to it? Does the .mrc file
extension indicate it is also a file format, or is this being used for MARC
records created at this particular institution?
...stevenc
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "A. Ralph Papakhian" <papakhi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: arsclist Cataloging


> hi,
> attached (i hope) is a "raw" marc record.
> it's for Victor AM 257, created by the library of congress.

-
For subscription instructions, see the ARSC home page
http://www.arsc-audio.org/arsclist.html
Copyright of individual posting is owned by the author of the posting and
permission to re-transmit or publish a post must be secured
from the author of the post.


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]